The 2nd part will add some actionable insights through the examination of post-Kuhnian thought and the debate for and against method.

2 articles with this philosopher.
Forget normative philosophical analyses of how science should be. Instead ask - what are scientists actually doing?
It’s not a bug, it’s a feature: science is successful because it strikes a unique balance of dogmatism that can be overturned during crisis.
He’s the external consultant from JP Morgan, handing over a 300 page analysis on the social power dynamics of the IT department.
That document is never read, but quoted in every leadership meeting to justify whatever they already decided.