Now that we understand our trainwreck of a situation, time for some actual practical advice. This last part will be thin on philosophy, and just concentrate on making you an effective tester in the age of GenAI.
Tag
philosophy of science
6 articles with this tag.
After failing to build our inductive bridge in part 1, we take the leap anyway to explore what our inductive inferences are even worth when put against the alien form of life that is GenAI.
We begin our exploration of induction informed testing with a straightforward exploration of Hume's riddle of induction, and possible answers and objections. These will lay the foundation for a more nuanced delve in parts 2 and 3.
The 2nd part will add some actionable insights through the examination of post-Kuhnian thought and the debate for and against method.
The 1st part will walk through an overview of Kuhn's work, and suggest a mapping of his vocabulary onto a modern software environment.
In this post we'll examine the modern test suite though the lens of dustbowl empiricism. By the end we will have connected everything through a Popperian (with a dash of Bacon) approach.
