The 2nd part will add some actionable insights through the examination of post-Kuhnian thought and the debate for and against method.
Philosopher
Karl Popper
3 articles with this philosopher.
Extreme TL;DR summary
Nothing can ever be inductively justified.
It’s scientific <=> It can be refuted.
If he were in the modern software business
He’s the obnoxious tester who thinks he’s smarted than everyone and saving the company every day, but actually just extremely rude (well, he is smarter than most).
Ho, and there was that time when he chased the release manager around with a stick.
The 1st part will walk through an overview of Kuhn's work, and suggest a mapping of his vocabulary onto a modern software environment.
In this post we'll examine the modern test suite though the lens of dustbowl empiricism. By the end we will have connected everything through a Popperian (with a dash of Bacon) approach.
